Meanwhile, learning my way around and finding how to get what I want from it. I do understand it’s value right time and place. And I turn off all the bleeds! I’ve spent too much of my life dealing with the problems of bleed to willingly add it! □ They used kick inside, outside, and sub to achieve their desire, I got just as much only using the inside mic. Far less encumbered and sounds as good or better than any with all the processing. I stripped down and built a simple basic kit with my own methods. Of course, we all have opinions on what is good, optimal or otherwise. Some engineers did a wonderful job doing that but when I strip them down to the actual drum, it is. One additional comment on the kits in AD2 - a single kit, such as Studio Prog, when you pull up the kit in the AD2 instance, offers perhaps 20 different variations, which are all displayed in the kit window, so even if you have a small. I also know many techniques and methods to bring less than optimum drums up to that benchmark. Addictive Drums 2 also has a bunch of notes mapped, if you use their AD2 standard mapping in the Map Window. As an engineer I know the ease and joy of recording a kit that sounds great. Installed and working as I learn my way around. ![]() #Addictive drums 2 no license free#Feel free to share you thoughts on it once you get some time with it. Hopefully your find on SD3 isn't a case of "too good to be true". TT SD was interesting with kits by Al Schmitt and Chuck Ainley but I wasn't finding what I was used to with BFD in the little time I had to check it out. The choices BFD made were a great fit for what I was looking for with a good range of expansions (ya can never have enough snares) including samples from quality 3rd party vendors that dropped right in. Not quite sure what you meant by this, as anything you buy is always at the discretion of some recording engineer (drums/tuning/mics/mic placement/preamps/room) unless you record it yourself. I got into BFD when demos started having to sound like polished masters. Isn't always an option and especially so for drums. I did this in Session Drummer3, Ad2, SSD5, MTPowerdrum, and now hear ya, but, I turn all that off anyway as I typically prefer to choose my own devices and use discrete outputs so that I have individual faders for each piece in CbB. AD2 has plenty of fx available for individual pieces. I do like SD3 better than AD2, but you’re mistaken. Year / Release Date : Version : 2.1.9 Developer : XLN Audio Developer’s site : XLN Audio Format : VST / AAX / AU (MODiFiED) Bit : 32bit, 64bit Tabletka : present System Requirements. That's all I can offer, but I hope it helps. A big benefit is that the drum samples sound quite good with nothing on them. Over time, I have created a few defaults kits that I use as a starting point and go from there. The f/x are very good, with lots of presets for all drums. Because SD3 has a complete mixer, I only need one instance of it to get my sound. With AD2, I have to use multiple instances of it to process individual drums where each instance uses only one drum, thus, I sometimes have to use 4-6 separate tracks to get the sound I want. My only choice is to annoy the group and ask here. I have dragged a couple of BEAT patterns into the workspace, but i can't get nuttin'. I inserted the synth with a couple of AD2 tracks routed to master left and right. ![]() I am trying to get some sound out of addictive drums 2. I always start with bare tracks and apply f/x only as needed to individual tracks or the whole kit. Addictive Drums 2 - Newbie Question - No Sound. The big difference to me is the fact that the on-board mixer in SD3 can apply f/x to individual tracks as well as the entire kit, whereas AD2 f/x can only be applied globally to the whole kit. Keni, I have used AD1 & 2, as well as SD2 & 3, and after 12 years of using VSTs for drums I prefer SD3.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorHeather ArchivesCategories |